<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">They still do in Kentucky.Quote:
Originally posted by LanDroid:
Weren't kids routinely getting married at age 16 around 150 years ago? Interesting how morals "evolve"...
Printable View
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">They still do in Kentucky.Quote:
Originally posted by LanDroid:
Weren't kids routinely getting married at age 16 around 150 years ago? Interesting how morals "evolve"...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Not even that long ago. My grandmother married at 16, with parental consent. That was about 90 years ago.Quote:
Originally posted by LanDroid:
Weren't kids routinely getting married at age 16 around 150 years ago? Interesting how morals "evolve"...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">When they were getting married at 16 they were also working at 16 and understood the realities of life not hanging out at the mall thinking about what the next ring tone will be.Quote:
Originally posted by LanDroid:
Weren't kids routinely getting married at age 16 around 150 years ago? Interesting how morals "evolve"...
I have to agree w/Trav on this one. I doubt there are too many 15 yr old girls at the Ursuline Academy who could pull off a Joan of Arc. Plus another thing, 500 years ago people lived on average to be, what, 45? 50 at most? Nowadays, 45 is often about the half-way point. There was a much narrower window back in the days.
But that said, as I mentioned earlier, I can live with whatever the legislature deems to be the age of consent. As regards the topic of this thread, my concern what that a teacher-student relationship should not itself create criminal conduct where it otherwise would not exist.